Boston-Proper COVID-19 Update (24-Dec-2020 data)

 

  • Green - Less than 4 cases per 100,000 people per day
  • Yellow - Greater than or equal to 4 and less than 8 cases per 100,000 people per day
  • Orange - Greater than or equal to 8 and less than 16 cases per 100,000 people per day
  • Red - Greater than or equal to 16 and less than 24 cases per 100,000 people per day 
  • Maroon- Greater than or equal to 24 and less than 40 cases per 100,000 people per day
  • Purple- Greater than or equal to 40 and less than 64 cases per 100,000 people per day
  • Black - Greater than or equal to 64 cases per 100,000 people per day
Information right next to the city/town name is the most recent information and the furthest to the right is the furthest back.  Each number is the outcome of taking this week's data, subtracting the data from 2 weeks ago, and dividing by 14 (to get the per day) and then dividing by the population of the location (to get the per person) and then multiplying by 100,000 (to get the per 100,000 people per day)
    • Allston/Brighton: 40.1<-40.4<-33.6<-24.9<-24.4<-21.8 <- 24.7 <- 15.4 <-   7.6 <-   5.6 <-   8.7 <- 11.1 <-   9.2 <-   5.0
    • Charlestown:        41.2<-46.4<-42.7<-26.9<-22.8<-22.8 <- 30.5 <- 18.0 <- 11.8 <-   7.4 <-   4.4 <-   3.7 <-   4.0 <-   4.8
    • Dorchester:           87.1<-95.1<-78.4<-57.9<-47.6<-44.2 <- 64.0 <- 41.6 <- 26.5 <- 19.8 <- 18.9 <- 15.8 <- 12.4 <-   7.9
    • Back Bay, ...:        48.8<-48.6<-39.2<-33.2<-33.2<-31.4 <- 32.1 <- 16.3 <- 12.7 <-   7.0 <-   6.3 <-   6.7 <-   5.7 <-   3.9
    • East Boston:         114.5<-116.0<-87.5<-69.9<-61.6<-65.3 <- 81.9 <- 49.0 <- 29.4 <- 22.7 <- 16.4 <- 17.7 <-  19.9 <- 34.6
    • Fenway:                30.9<-35.7<-34.6<-24.5<-21.1<-18.8 <- 23.5 <- 13.7 <- 12.7 <-   8.0 <-   4.6 <-   6.2 <-   6.7 <-   6.7
    • Hyde Park:            62.6<-65.2<-56.2<-40.9<-36.9<-30.9 <- 36.9 <- 24.2 <- 16.1 <- 17.6 <- 17.6 <- 12.9 <- 10.3 <-   4.1
    • Jamaica Plain:       39.4<-41.7<-34.0<-23.2<-16.2<-19.0 <- 35.4 <- 22.7 <- 16.0 <- 12.7 <- 11.4 <-   6.7 <-   4.9 <-   7.9
    • Mattapan:              51.6<-47.2<-37.1<-29.2<-29.2<-28.7 <- 42.0 <- 27.8 <- 18.3 <- 11.7 <-   9.8 <-   9.0 <-   7.9 <-   5.2
    • Roslindale:            64.7<-72.2<-56.3<-42.7<-41.5<-36.7 <- 48.3 <- 30.7 <- 19.8 <- 13.5 <- 10.4 <-   9.9 <- 10.9 <-   5.3
    • Roxbury:               41.5<-37.4<-34.9<-26.4<-24.7<-26.7 <- 34.1 <- 20.8 <- 18.0 <- 12.5 <-   9.6 <-   6.7 <-   6.6 <-   5.4
    • South Boston:       93.3<-91.7<-70.5<-53.5<-50.8<-54.4 <- 53.5 <- 24.2 <- 15.6 <- 12.0 <- 12.9 <- 14.5 <- 13.1 <-   2.3
    • South End:            49.0<-55.4<-45.9<-34.9<-37.5<-33.8 <- 42.4 <- 27.8 <- 20.5 <- 18.1 <-   9.7 <-   7.3 <-   6.6 <-   3.8
    • West Roxbury:      57.1<-52.5<-43.6<-34.0<-24.8<-13.5 <- 13.3 <-   9.0 <-   4.6 <-   4.0 <-   4.4 <-   5.0 <-   4.2 <-   2.1
    • All of Boston:       61.4<-63.5<-52.3<-39.5<-35.0<-33.3 <- 42.6 <- 26.1 <- 17.5 <- 13.1 <- 11.5 <- 10.5 <-   9.4 <-   7.5
    *Back Bay, Beacon Hill, Downtown, North End and West End combined

    Summary: Much like the rest of Massachusetts, some areas of Boston are improving ever so slightly, which is a good sign since their cases aren't increasing dramatically as they were earlier this month, but they're not decreasing in sufficient levels to think we're doing a good enough job at driving the cases down so that we'll see a reduction in hospitalizations and/or deaths without some other factor coming into play.

    Stay safe. Stay sane. Stay informed. 

    Numbers gathered from https://bphc.org/whatwedo/infectious-diseases/Infectious-Diseases-A-to-Z/covid-19/Pages/default.aspx

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    MA Wastewater Tracking (23-Jan-2024 data)

    Image
    See that little uptick at the end of each graph? This didn't happen in 2022 but did in 2023. We understood the goal in 2022 (to some degree) but since ... is there some portion of the population who says "covid spread must be down so let's go nuts"? I suspect this is partially colleges reconvening their students on campuses where in 2022 they were still trying to get their students to maintain some precautions and they haven't been since... but I also don't think this is just college campuses.
    Read more

    Fun with MA COVID-19 Reporting 02-Nov-2020 Edition - NEW LAYOUT IN THE REPORT!

    THERE'S A NEW REPORT LAYOUT! (there will be a separate post about current counts/prediction follow up) It's always interesting to see a new layout because it gives insight into what the state's priorities and story-telling is.  Today's layout shows that they continue to be either sloppy with their design OR they want to try to confuse people by putting deaths and turn-around time for test results under the same heading line, similar to how all testing/cases are under one and how all information on hospitalizations are under a second line. We now have an "average age of deaths"... but we don't have which average it is, whether it's mean, median, mode, or whether it's overall or for the newly reported or the last 7 days or last 14 days or any kind of detail around it.... same with the new "average age of cases that were hospitalized". They're no longer showing the percent of individuals tested testing positive and only showing the perce...
    Read more

    Switching to Wastewater Monitoring Only

    Case counts were already somewhat misleading so, if people were actually paying attention to the wastewater and had a target and/or threshold for concern, that would actually be potentially a more reasonable thing to monitor... with that in mind, let's look at some time points to try to find some measures to consider.  Let's start with establishing a few thresholds.   Early on in the pandemic, we said 8 cases per 100,000 people per day was the highest threshold of concern (ie, that was the introduction to the highest risk-rating we had).  Later, we relaxed this a bit because we realized that this would keep us on high alert and never allow us to go back to normal ... sort of like saying that everybody is smoking so the threshold that for risking cancer shouldn't be smoking 3 cigarettes a day but instead should be a pack a day.  Based on this relaxing of concern, let's go ahead and add in 16 cases per 100,000 people per day as a threshold to monitor for, just as ...
    Read more